Skip to main content


Banks and tax evasion
Putting the squeeze on Miami vice

Jan 18th 2014, 11:09 by M.V. | NEW YORK

IT HAS become a lot less comfortable to be an American with an undisclosed offshore bank account in recent years, thanks to the federal prosecutors who have harried foreign moneymen and lawyers suspected of aiding tax evasion, particularly in Switzerland.

 Now life is also about to get harder for non-Americans who dodge their fiscal obligations at home by stuffing savings in American banks.

Forced to offer some degree of reciprocity as it hounds other countries for information on American tax cheats, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) drew up a rule in 2012 that would, for the first time, force American banks to cough up data on “non-resident aliens” who hold accounts with them. This would then be passed on to tax authorities in the account-holders’ home countries.

This gave rise to much huffing and puffing from banks which hold a lot of Latin American money, for instance in Miami's financial district (pictured). 

The banking associations of Florida and Texas jointly sued the feds, claiming the regulation was overly burdensome and could lead to massive capital flight because legitimate customers might fear their information would be disclosed to, and misused by, rogue governments. 

This week, a federal court in the District of Columbia threw out the challenge, clearing the way for the new rule to take effect in March.

The banking associations had argued in their motion for summary judgment that the rule violated both the Administrative Procedure Act and the Regulatory Flexibility Act. They contended that the IRS had got its economics wrong and that the new requirement would cause more harm to banks than the agency had foreseen. 

In making their case that it might spark enough capital flight to destabilise local banks and economies, they pointed to the case of Canada, the only country that already has a reciprocal bank information-exchange agreement with the United States.

 When that pact took effect in 2000, they argued, large sums were pulled from American banks by panicky Canadians.

In a 23-page ruling, Judge James Boasberg swatted aside these arguments, writing that the IRS had “reasonably concluded that the regulations will improve US tax compliance, deter foreign and domestic tax evasion, impose a minimal reporting burden on banks, and not cause any rational actor—other than a tax evader—to withdraw his funds from US accounts.” The judge accepted the IRS’s contention that the alleged Canadian capital flight was “a fiction”: though the amount of Canadian interest-bearing deposits dipped after the reporting requirements were issued, they bounced back shortly afterwards. The court also noted that the IRS will only pass information on to the 70 countries with which it has information-exchange agreements. These require signatories to store information responsibly and treat it as secret.

It’s unclear how much money could be affected. 

The IRS has estimated that foreign individuals have up to $400 billion in American accounts. 

Miami’s financial centre has the most to fear, though it has become less accommodating towards dirty money over the past decade, and a good deal of what remains is thought to have been moved out of banks and into local property. 

The court ruling also marks a defeat for the numerous senior Florida and Texas politicians who threw their weight behind the banks, among them Marco Rubio, a United States senator with presidential ambitions, who introduced a bill to kill the regulation.

Had opponents been successful, the government would have found it harder to get other countries to go along with the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), a law passed in 2010 that requires financial institutions in other countries to report to the IRS funds held by American customers.

 FATCA, which is due to come into force in July after several delays, has supercharged the expansion of a network of bilateral tax-information accords, leaving the tax-shy with far fewer places to hide. America has done much of the stick-wielding to make this happen. The court’s ruling this week ensures it will also be able to offer some carrots.

Popular posts from this blog


While "Flavor" is very subjective, and each country that grows mangoes is very nationalistic, these are the mango varieties that are the most sought after around the world because of sweetnesss (Brix) and demand.

The Chaunsa has a Brix rating in the 22 degree level which is unheard of!
Carabao claims to be the sweetest mango in the world and was able to register this in the Guiness book of world records.
Perhaps it is time for a GLOBAL taste test ???

In alphabetical order by Country....



Alphonso (mango)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alphonso (हापुस Haapoos in Marathi, હાફુસ in Gujarati, ಆಪೂಸ್ Aapoos in Kannada) is a mango cultivar that is considered by many[who?] to be one of the best in terms of sweetness, richness and flavor. 

It has considerable shelf life of a week after it is ripe making it exportable. 

It is also one of the most expensive kinds of mango and is grown mainly in Kokan region of western India.

 It is in season April through May and the fruit wei…

INDIA 2016 : Mango production in state likely to take a hit this year

TNN | May 22, 2016, 12.32 PM IST

Mangaluru: Vagaries of nature is expected to take a toll on the production of King of Fruits - Mango - in Karnataka this year. A combination of failure of pre-monsoon showers at the flowering and growth stage and spike in temperature in mango growing belt of the state is expected to limit the total production of mango to an estimated 12 lakh tonnes in the current season as against 14 lakh tonnes in the last calendar year.

However, the good news for fruit lovers is that this could see price of mangoes across varieties decrease marginally by 2-3%. This is mainly on account of 'import' of the fruit from other mango-growing states in India, said M Kamalakshi Rajanna, chairperson, Karnataka State Mango Development and Marketing Corporation Ltd.

Karnataka is the third largest mango-growing state in India after Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra.

Inaugurating a two-day Vasanthotsava organized by Shivarama Karantha Pilikula Nisargadhama and the Corporation at P…

Mangoes date back 65 million years according to research ...

Experts at the Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany (BSIP) here have traced the origin of mango to the hills of Meghalaya, India from a 65 million year-old fossil of a mango leaf. 

The earlier fossil records of mango (Mangifera indica) from the Northeast and elsewhere were 25 to 30 million years old. The 'carbonized leaf fossil' from Damalgiri area of Meghalaya hills, believed to be a mango tree from the peninsular India, was found by Dr R. C. Mehrotra, senior scientist, BSIP and his colleagues. 

After careful analysis of the fossil of the mango leaf and leaves of modern plants, the BISP scientist found many of the fossil leaf characters to be similar to mangifera.

An extensive study of the anatomy and morphology of several modern-day species of the genus mangifera with the fossil samples had reinforced the concept that its centre of origin is Northeast India, from where it spread into neighbouring areas, says Dr. Mehrotra. 

The genus is believed to have disseminated into neighb…