Skip to main content

USDA announces crack-down on companies deceptively using 'organic' in brand names

Friday, August 22, 2014 

by: L.J. Devon, Staff Writer

(NaturalNews) It's a Wild West in the organic market, with some companies acting deceptively, using "organic" in their brand name when in reality their food products aren't all certified by a third party. 

Consumers are quick to give up on healthy food and supplements, because it's sometimes hard to trust the company's invalidated "organic" label or brand name. 

Organic products have to fulfill rigorous standards and go through expensive testing and procedures to be classified as truly organic. 

This is because a large portion of today's agriculture has been patented by genetically modified seed science, which cross-contaminates organic crop. 

To be truly organic in today's society, farmers have to dodge all the genetically modified cross-contamination and prove through third-party standards that their end product is indeed untarnished.

All this corruption and genetic manipulation of the food supply begs for more regulation and those regulations fall on the organic industry the most. 

The USDA recently announced a crack-down on the organic market, as it reins in misleading language on food product packaging that often confuses consumers with vague "organic" promises.

"Unless a food product is certified organic it cannot display, overtly, the word 'organic' on the front panel of the product,"
said Mark A. Kastel, Codirector at The Cornucopia Institute, an organic industry watchdog.

Newman's Own Organics inadvertently uses its brand name to confuse customers

More consumers want third-party accountability if they are going to buy organic products. The USDA stamp of approval, although not perfect, is a strong standard for companies to follow.

Some companies, like Newman's Own Organics, do not use the USDA organic label on all their products but instead rely on their brand name to sell the organic way.

 According to the USDA, Newman's Organics has been selling unqualified products and getting away with it by using Organics in their trade name. 

The Cornucopia Institute called Newman's out in 2010 with a legal complaint against their unproven use of the phrase "Made with Organic Ingredients."

This blanket "organic" statement can mislead consumers. When Cornucopia filed the original complaint against Newman's Organics, they exposed how the company markets "made with organic wheat and sugar," while refusing to tell that the more expensive ingredients are not actually organic.

"Other brands of organic cookies that have to compete on store shelves with Newman's, such as Country Choice, go to the effort and expense to procure organic ginger and all other available organic ingredients, and present a product of true integrity to the consuming public,"
said Cornucopia's Kastel.

What's more is that Newman's Own Organics only offer a small percentage of products that are actually certified organic with the USDA.

"When products qualify for the made with organic label, it means they have a minimum of 70% organic content. Newman's Own Organics ginger cookies didn't even contain organic ginger when we did our initial investigation in 2010. That's what I call misleading!" stated Kastel.

Cornucopia Institute spurs USDA to crack down on deceptive organic brand names

Ultimately, it was the work of The Cornucopia Institute that spurred the enforcement of the USDA standards. In their initial legal complaint with Newman's Organics, they notified USDA Deputy Administrator Miles McEvoy, who receives consumer concerns from his leading post on the National Organics Program.

The result: The organic food industry, including Newman's Own Organics, will have to comply with the USDA's new policy clarifications which will enforce
"fairness and equity in label use throughout the organic industry and to satisfy consumer expectations for organic products."

Kastel praised the new rule enforcement:
"We applaud the USDA for making this ruling, and instructions to organic certifiers, in tightening up the labeling requirements that will protect ethical industry participants and prevent consumers from being misled when they are cruising the grocery aisles."

Popular posts from this blog


While "Flavor" is very subjective, and each country that grows mangoes is very nationalistic, these are the mango varieties that are the most sought after around the world because of sweetnesss (Brix) and demand.

The Chaunsa has a Brix rating in the 22 degree level which is unheard of!
Carabao claims to be the sweetest mango in the world and was able to register this in the Guiness book of world records.
Perhaps it is time for a GLOBAL taste test ???

In alphabetical order by Country....



Alphonso (mango)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alphonso (हापुस Haapoos in Marathi, હાફુસ in Gujarati, ಆಪೂಸ್ Aapoos in Kannada) is a mango cultivar that is considered by many[who?] to be one of the best in terms of sweetness, richness and flavor. 

It has considerable shelf life of a week after it is ripe making it exportable. 

It is also one of the most expensive kinds of mango and is grown mainly in Kokan region of western India.

 It is in season April through May and the fruit wei…

INDIA 2016 : Mango production in state likely to take a hit this year

TNN | May 22, 2016, 12.32 PM IST

Mangaluru: Vagaries of nature is expected to take a toll on the production of King of Fruits - Mango - in Karnataka this year. A combination of failure of pre-monsoon showers at the flowering and growth stage and spike in temperature in mango growing belt of the state is expected to limit the total production of mango to an estimated 12 lakh tonnes in the current season as against 14 lakh tonnes in the last calendar year.

However, the good news for fruit lovers is that this could see price of mangoes across varieties decrease marginally by 2-3%. This is mainly on account of 'import' of the fruit from other mango-growing states in India, said M Kamalakshi Rajanna, chairperson, Karnataka State Mango Development and Marketing Corporation Ltd.

Karnataka is the third largest mango-growing state in India after Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra.

Inaugurating a two-day Vasanthotsava organized by Shivarama Karantha Pilikula Nisargadhama and the Corporation at P…

Mangoes date back 65 million years according to research ...

Experts at the Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany (BSIP) here have traced the origin of mango to the hills of Meghalaya, India from a 65 million year-old fossil of a mango leaf. 

The earlier fossil records of mango (Mangifera indica) from the Northeast and elsewhere were 25 to 30 million years old. The 'carbonized leaf fossil' from Damalgiri area of Meghalaya hills, believed to be a mango tree from the peninsular India, was found by Dr R. C. Mehrotra, senior scientist, BSIP and his colleagues. 

After careful analysis of the fossil of the mango leaf and leaves of modern plants, the BISP scientist found many of the fossil leaf characters to be similar to mangifera.

An extensive study of the anatomy and morphology of several modern-day species of the genus mangifera with the fossil samples had reinforced the concept that its centre of origin is Northeast India, from where it spread into neighbouring areas, says Dr. Mehrotra. 

The genus is believed to have disseminated into neighb…