Skip to main content


ILA’s Daggett ‘furious’ at NY-NJ port strike

Joseph Bonney, Senior Editor | Feb 01, 2016 12:56PM EST

ILA President Harold Daggett

Last Friday’s surprise dockworker strike at the Port of New York and New Jersey wasn’t instigated by any single International Longshoremen’s Association local and was not sanctioned by the union, ILA President Harold Daggett said Monday.

“I was furious that these guys walked out,”
Daggett told

Daggett angrily disputed reports that the strike originated within the ILA’s mechanics Local 1804-1, which he headed for years and now is led by his son Dennis, the international union’s executive vice president.

“Everybody walked out together,”
the ILA president said. “It wasn’t just one local that did this.”

Daggett said he had no advance word of the strike, which began when ILA workers suddenly walked out of all terminals at 10 a.m. Friday, delaying thousands of pickups and deliveries and leaving some drayage drivers stranded inside terminals for hours.

Work resumed Friday night after an arbitrator ruled the walkout a violation of the union’s no-strike contract, and the ILA urged members to return to work. The New York Shipping Association had been preparing to go to court to seek a back-to-work injunction.

All terminals returned to full operations Monday morning with heavy truck traffic and long queues outside gates. Friday’s walkout came as the East Coast’s busiest port was backlogged after a four-day winter storm closed the port last week.

Because the strike was unaccompanied by picket signs or any official explanation, there was confusion over its cause and timing.

Daggett shed no light on that in a brief telephone interview, but ILA spokesman James McNamara said workers described it as a spontaneous protest to highlight alleged harassment by the Waterfront Commission of New York Harbor, and union concerns about chassis jurisdiction and technology.

The ILA and the commission have clashed over the commission’s effort to shake up the waterfront work culture by reducing the union’s traditional influence over job referrals, and over the union’s complaints that the commission is harassing members.

The Waterfront Commission is unique to New York-New Jersey. It was created in 1953 to fight corruption on the docks. The agency regulates the size of the longshore workforce, performs licensing and background checks, and conducts investigations.

In 2012 the union and its employers unsuccessfully sued the commission, claiming the commission overstepped its authority by trying to micromanage hiring procedures established in the NYSA-ILA labor contract. A federal appeals court is expected to rule on the case soon.

Walter Arsenault, the Waterfront Commission’s executive director, said fair and nondiscriminatory hiring and drug testing are the only two issues in the past year in which the ILA contends the agency has interfered with the union’s collective bargaining rights.

“We’re not backing down on either issue,” 
Arsenault said. “Port safety is too important to compromise by not drug-testing people, and we certainly aren’t going to back down on our insistence that they hire in a fair and nondiscriminatory fashion.”

He would not comment on reports of a current federal investigation of corruption involving ILA members.

McNamara said numerous workers have complained that the commission has used the union contracts drug-testing requirements to harass dockworkers, including ILA members in 12-step recovery programs.

Arsenault said Local 1804-1 “has repeatedly gone to court to quash subpoenas for drug testing, and they’ve repeatedly lost. We will continue to drug-test when we have reasonable suspicion that someone is under the influence.”

The Waterfront Commission has opened an investigation to try to identify the organizers of last week’s strike. Arsenault said that, depending on what investigators learn, investigators could impose administrative penalties or even seek criminal prosecution.

He said he couldn’t speculate about what the striking ILA members hoped to accomplish.
“Other than flexing their muscle, I really don’t know,” he said. “Anybody who’s taken a look at it says that they damage themselves by doing this.”

Contact Joseph Bonney at and follow him on Twitter: @JosephBonney.

Popular posts from this blog


While "Flavor" is very subjective, and each country that grows mangoes is very nationalistic, these are the mango varieties that are the most sought after around the world because of sweetnesss (Brix) and demand.

The Chaunsa has a Brix rating in the 22 degree level which is unheard of!
Carabao claims to be the sweetest mango in the world and was able to register this in the Guiness book of world records.
Perhaps it is time for a GLOBAL taste test ???

In alphabetical order by Country....



Alphonso (mango)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Alphonso (हापुस Haapoos in Marathi, હાફુસ in Gujarati, ಆಪೂಸ್ Aapoos in Kannada) is a mango cultivar that is considered by many[who?] to be one of the best in terms of sweetness, richness and flavor. 

It has considerable shelf life of a week after it is ripe making it exportable. 

It is also one of the most expensive kinds of mango and is grown mainly in Kokan region of western India.

 It is in season April through May and the fruit wei…

INDIA 2016 : Mango production in state likely to take a hit this year

TNN | May 22, 2016, 12.32 PM IST

Mangaluru: Vagaries of nature is expected to take a toll on the production of King of Fruits - Mango - in Karnataka this year. A combination of failure of pre-monsoon showers at the flowering and growth stage and spike in temperature in mango growing belt of the state is expected to limit the total production of mango to an estimated 12 lakh tonnes in the current season as against 14 lakh tonnes in the last calendar year.

However, the good news for fruit lovers is that this could see price of mangoes across varieties decrease marginally by 2-3%. This is mainly on account of 'import' of the fruit from other mango-growing states in India, said M Kamalakshi Rajanna, chairperson, Karnataka State Mango Development and Marketing Corporation Ltd.

Karnataka is the third largest mango-growing state in India after Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra.

Inaugurating a two-day Vasanthotsava organized by Shivarama Karantha Pilikula Nisargadhama and the Corporation at P…

Mangoes date back 65 million years according to research ...

Experts at the Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany (BSIP) here have traced the origin of mango to the hills of Meghalaya, India from a 65 million year-old fossil of a mango leaf. 

The earlier fossil records of mango (Mangifera indica) from the Northeast and elsewhere were 25 to 30 million years old. The 'carbonized leaf fossil' from Damalgiri area of Meghalaya hills, believed to be a mango tree from the peninsular India, was found by Dr R. C. Mehrotra, senior scientist, BSIP and his colleagues. 

After careful analysis of the fossil of the mango leaf and leaves of modern plants, the BISP scientist found many of the fossil leaf characters to be similar to mangifera.

An extensive study of the anatomy and morphology of several modern-day species of the genus mangifera with the fossil samples had reinforced the concept that its centre of origin is Northeast India, from where it spread into neighbouring areas, says Dr. Mehrotra. 

The genus is believed to have disseminated into neighb…